Continental Warranty vs Penn Warranty Corporation

Continental Warranty was established in 1999. With many years of expertise in the extended warranty sector, they have earned a reputation for offering dependable coverage nationwide. This firm was formed in Delaware and has since spread their services to consumers nationwide via its dealerships. Since 2001, the Better Business Bureau (BBB) has granted them an A+ rating and certification. They offer service contracts nationwide, providing coverage options throughout the US and Canada. While the plans offer comprehensive coverage, additional features such as roadside assistance, turbocharger coverage, GPS coverage, and others come at an extra cost. The company has an A+ grade with the BBB, but many review websites have low scores from customers. The BBB gives it a 1.67 rating, Birdeye gives it a 2.3 rating, and Yelp gives it a 1.8 rating. Customer feedback shows that owners of vehicles have mixed views about the business. Customers are either happy that the company saved them money or upset that they weren't covered for fixes they thought they would be. 

Penn Warranty Corporation is known for their commitment to customer service and providing reliable coverage options. They offer different plans to accommodate varying needs and budgets, allowing customers to choose the level of coverage that suits them best. Like other companies in the extended auto warranty industry, Penn Warranty aims to assist drivers in managing and mitigating the financial impact of unexpected vehicle repairs. They are an extended auto warranty company that has been in business for over 30 years. They offer a variety of plans to fit most budgets.

They are backed by an A-rated insurer, but they have a complicated claim process. They have received numerous conflicting reviews, ranging from positive to negative, with most customers expressing dissatisfaction with their experiences. According to some of the good reviews, customers appreciate the lower cost, the option to choose their own repair business, and roadside help. The negative feedback, on the other hand, varied from restricted coverage and bad customer service to customers believing their contracts were dishonest.