Several.com: One Buyers Guide.  Your Go-To Resource...

Several Footer col 1

Several Footer col 2

Several Footer col 3

Several Header

several.com

Several.com: One Buyers Guide. Your Go-To Resource

Stay up-to-date with the latest consumer updates & trends on our news page. Get expert insights & extensive coverage to become a more informed & savvy consumer.

Find the Latest Consumer News & Updates

<h3>Sideloading</h3>

<p>The most reliable way to keep an unsupported e-reader useful is manual file transfer. Simply connect it to a computer using a USB cable. The device will appear as external storage, allowing you to move compatible ebook files into the correct folder. Once done, eject the device and start reading.</p>

<p>This method works best with DRM-free titles. Many publishers and public domain libraries offer books without digital restrictions. After transfer, these files live entirely on your device, no login required, no store connection needed. If your collection includes DRM-protected files, transferring them may require additional software. Keep in mind that removing digital locks can raise legal questions depending on where you live, so it's important to understand those limits before attempting anything beyond basic file management.</p>

<p>Because the device cannot connect to an online store, you must manually organize and maintain your ebook collection.</p>

<ul>
	<li>Keep a master ebook library on your computer</li>
	<li>Convert files into compatible formats before transferring</li>
	<li>Back up your collection to an external drive</li>
	<li>Archive finished titles to manage storage space</li>
</ul>

<h3>Jailbreaking</h3>

<p>Some users choose to modify the device's firmware to remove manufacturer restrictions. This process is commonly called jailbreaking. It allows installation of alternative reading software and community-developed tools, for example, KOReader, Plato, or Cool Reader. These programs can improve PDF handling, support more file types, and give greater control over layout and customization.</p>

<p>However, this path requires technical precision. It often involves identifying the exact model and firmware version, downloading specific installation files, and triggering a manual update process. Compatibility varies by device and software version. There are risks. A failed attempt can permanently disable the device. Security protections may be reduced. Warranty coverage, if any remains, can be voided. Legal considerations also vary by region when modifying firmware or bypassing digital protections.</p>

<p>For the average user, manual sideloading provides enough functionality without taking on those risks. If the device still works, leave it configured as it is and avoid unnecessary resets. Older models that depended on discontinued network technologies have shown what can happen after a factory reset. Once registration servers or legacy networks are no longer supported, reactivating the device may not be possible. A reset can turn a working reader into a device that cannot be set up again.</p>

<p>For more articles like this, check out our <a href="https://several.com/news/tag/tech" target="_blank">Tech News</a> page!</p>


How to Make an Unsupported Kindle Usable Again

How to Keep Your Unsupported E-Reader Alive

<h2 id="what-vehicles-are-affected">What Vehicles Are Affected</h2>

<p>The recall covers specific newer Hyundai and Genesis models, including:</p>

<ul>
	<li>Hyundai Ioniq 6 (2023&ndash;2025)</li>
	<li>Genesis G90 (2023&ndash;2026)</li>
	<li>Hyundai Santa Fe (2024&ndash;2026)</li>
	<li>Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid (2024&ndash;2026)</li>
</ul>

<p>In total, about 294,128 vehicles are included in the U.S. recall.&nbsp;</p>

<p>These are not older vehicles. Many are recent model years, which is part of why the recall has drawn attention.</p>

<h2 id="what-is-causing-the-problem">What Is Causing the Problem</h2>

<p>The issue appears to come from the seat belt anchor assembly itself. Regulators say the anchor may not have been properly secured during manufacturing. Under crash forces, it can separate from the vehicle body instead of holding firm.&nbsp;</p>

<p>This is different from earlier Hyundai seat belt recalls that involved latch or pretensioner problems. In this case, the concern is structural. Even if the belt locks as expected, a detached anchor would mean the system cannot properly restrain the occupant.</p>

<p>Seat belts remain one of the most important safety features in any vehicle, and a failure at the anchor point removes a key layer of protection. In a crash, this can allow passengers to move forward more than expected, increase the chance of hitting interior surfaces, and reduce how well airbags can do their job. Regulators have warned that this defect may prevent the seat belt from adequately restraining occupants, which is why recalls involving restraint systems are treated with urgency.</p>

<h2 id="what-hyundai-is-doing---what-drivers-should-do-next">What Hyundai Is Doing & What Drivers Should Do Next</h2>

<p>Hyundai has confirmed that dealers will inspect affected vehicles and complete repairs at no cost. The fix may involve reinforcing the seat belt anchor or replacing the anchor assembly, depending on the condition of the vehicle.</p>

<p>Owner notification letters are expected to be mailed on June 5, 2026, but drivers do not need to wait to take action. VIN lookup tools are already available, allowing owners to check if their vehicle is included in the recall.</p>

<p>If your vehicle is affected, you should verify your VIN through Hyundai or the <a href="https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls" target="_blank">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a>, then schedule a repair appointment with a dealership as soon as possible. This issue does not present clear warning signs, and the defect may only become apparent during a crash. Even if everything appears normal, delaying the repair could increase safety risks.</p>

<p>For more industry updates, visit our <a href="https://several.com/news/tag/automotive" target="_blank">automotive news section</a>.</p>


Hyundai Recall Targets Seat Belt Anchor Defect in 294,000 Vehicles

Hyundai Recall Over Seat Belt Anchor Defect In The US

<p>However, the complaints claim that LinkedIn&rsquo;s actions go beyond what users would reasonably expect. The plaintiffs argue that vague references to &ldquo;browser data&rdquo; or &ldquo;add-ons&rdquo; in a privacy policy do not clearly explain that a website might actively scan a user&rsquo;s browser to identify installed extensions. One filing states that a typical user would not interpret those general disclosures as permission for what it describes as covert inspection of their device.</p>

<p>The controversy gained momentum after a report from the German advocacy group <a href="https://www.fairlinked.org/en/" target="_blank">Fairlinked</a> claimed that LinkedIn uses a script that runs when users load the site, allowing it to detect thousands of browser extensions. Independent testing by security researchers has confirmed that LinkedIn performs extension detection through client-side scripts, though the scale and intent remain disputed.</p>

<p>The report suggests LinkedIn checks for more than 6,000 extensions, including tools unrelated to scraping. It also claims the script gathers device-level information such as memory capacity, screen size, language settings, and time zone. These data points are often used in browser fingerprinting, a method that can help identify unique devices.</p>

<p>Because LinkedIn accounts are tied to real identities, including names, job titles, and employers, many argue that combining this information with device data will allow for deeper profiling. Fairlinked goes further, claiming the scan includes extensions tied to sensitive areas such as political views, religion, and health-related tools. Some of these claims, including whether data is shared with third parties, have not been independently verified.</p>

<p>LinkedIn has strongly rejected the accusations. The company says the claims are exaggerated and tied to a dispute with a developer linked to a tool called Teamfluence, which it alleges was used to scrape LinkedIn data in violation of its terms of service.</p>

<p>In statements to media outlets, LinkedIn has described the allegations as inaccurate and insists that its extension scanning is disclosed in its privacy policy. The company maintains that it uses this information only to detect abuse and protect its systems, not to infer sensitive personal details about users.</p>

<p>Still, the lawsuits focus less on whether the scanning exists and more on whether users truly understood it. Lawyers behind the cases argue that meaningful consent requires clear and specific disclosure, not broad language that most users are unlikely to interpret in a technical way.</p>

<p>For more articles like this, check out our <a href="https://several.com/news/tag/tech" target="_blank">Tech News</a> page!</p>


LinkedIn Lands in Court for Spying on Your Browser Extensions

LinkedIn Faces Lawsuits Over Browser Data Tracking

<h3>Release date and rollout delays</h3>

<p>After multiple shifts, Michael is currently scheduled to hit theaters on April 24, 2026. The film was originally expected much earlier, but delays pushed it across release windows.</p>

<p>Lionsgate is handling domestic distribution, while Universal Pictures is managing international markets. The delays were not just routine scheduling changes. Reports point to significant restructuring late in production, particularly around the film&rsquo;s final act.</p>

<p>That kind of delay is not unusual for large biopics, but in this case, it signaled deeper issues behind the scenes.</p>

<h3>Cast and creative team</h3>

<p>At the center of the film is Jaafar Jackson, the nephew of Michael Jackson and son of Jermaine Jackson. His casting immediately drew attention, both for the physical resemblance and for the estate&rsquo;s close involvement.</p>

<p>The supporting cast includes:</p>

<ul>
	<li>Colman Domingo as Joe Jackson</li>
	<li>Nia Long as Katherine Jackson</li>
	<li>Miles Teller as John Branca</li>
	<li>Kat Graham as Diana Ross</li>
</ul>

<p>Behind the camera, the script comes from John Logan, with Graham King producing after Bohemian Rhapsody.</p>

<p>The estate&rsquo;s direct involvement, particularly through Branca, has become a key point of discussion about how the story is being framed.</p>

<h3>What the movie is about</h3>

<p>From early footage and official descriptions, Michael focuses heavily on Jackson&rsquo;s rise, from his early years with the Jackson 5 through his transformation into a global solo star.</p>

<p>The film leans into major performance recreations and studio moments, particularly around the creation of Thriller. It is positioned as both a spectacle and a character study, though its timeline appears to prioritize the early and peak years rather than a full cradle-to-grave narrative.</p>

<p>That creative decision becomes more significant when you look at what the film reportedly leaves out.</p>

<h3>Reshoots and the child abuse allegations controversy</h3>

<p>The biggest controversy surrounding Michael centers on reported reshoots that altered the film&rsquo;s third act.</p>

<p>According to multiple reports, the production reworked major portions of the film after legal concerns tied to past settlements. One key issue involved Jordan Chandler, with reports suggesting restrictions on depicting or referencing that case.</p>

<p>The result was a shift in the film&rsquo;s ending. Instead of addressing the allegations directly, the narrative reportedly pivots toward Jackson&rsquo;s relationship with his father and his career during the Bad era.</p>

<p>The reshoots were not minor. Reports estimate weeks of additional filming and millions in added costs.</p>

<p>This has fueled ongoing debate about whether a biopic can claim to be comprehensive while avoiding one of the most defining and controversial parts of its subject&rsquo;s life.</p>

<p>For context, Jackson denied allegations throughout his lifetime and was acquitted in 2005 of separate criminal charges. The topic resurfaced in modern media with Leaving Neverland, which the estate has strongly disputed.</p>

<h3>Family tensions and estate disputes</h3>

<p>The controversy is not limited to the film&rsquo;s content. It extends into the Jackson family itself.</p>

<p>Paris Jackson has publicly distanced herself from the project, stating that while she reviewed an early script, she did not feel her concerns were taken seriously. She has also been involved in ongoing legal disputes with estate executors, including Branca.</p>

<p>At the same time, reports have surfaced about a private screening where Janet Jackson and Jermaine Jackson allegedly clashed over the film. While details remain unconfirmed, the reported disagreement highlights internal divisions over how Michael Jackson&rsquo;s story should be told.</p>

<p>Taken together, these tensions reinforce a larger point: the narrative around Michael is not just cinematic. It is personal, legal, and still evolving.</p>

<h3>The unusual marketing strategy</h3>

<p>For a film of this scale, the promotional rollout has been surprisingly uneven.</p>

<p>On one hand, the teaser trailer reportedly generated massive global attention, signaling strong audience interest. On the other, there have been long stretches with limited marketing visibility, especially compared to other major biopics.</p>

<p>This has led to growing conversation about a &ldquo;lack of promo,&rdquo; particularly given the film&rsquo;s budget and cultural weight.</p>

<p>Some of that inconsistency may be tied to the reshoots and shifting narrative direction. There were also earlier discussions about possibly splitting the film into two parts, which could complicate marketing timelines.</p>

<p>Still, early tracking suggests that audience curiosity remains high. The real question is whether the conversation will center on the film itself or the controversies surrounding it.</p>

<h3>Final thoughts</h3>

<p>On paper, "Michael" has everything: a recognizable story, a built-in global audience, and a production team experienced in turning music legends into box office success. But in practice, it is navigating something far more delicate.</p>

<p>The reported reshoots, family disagreements, and questions about what the film chooses to include or exclude have already shaped how audiences view it. That means Michael will likely be judged on two fronts: as a piece of filmmaking and as a statement about history.</p>

<p>Whether it succeeds may depend less on how well it recreates iconic performances and more on how audiences respond to what is left unsaid.</p>

<p>For more articles like this, visit our <a href="https://several.com/news/tag/lifestyle" target="_blank">Lifestyle News Page</a>!</p>


“Michael” Biopic 2026: What We Know So Far

Michael Jackson’s Biopic “Michael”: All You Need to Know

<h3>What the Minnesota classic car bill actually does</h3>

<p>The proposal focuses on vehicles registered under <a href="https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/dvs/vehicle/license-plates/specialized-license-plates/collector-class-classic-street-rod-pioneer-and-classic-motorcycle-specialized-license-plates" target="_blank">Minnesota&rsquo;s collector classifications</a>, which include classic cars, street rods, vintage motorcycles, and military vehicles. In the state, an owner of a vehicle that is at least 20 years old and used sparingly may only pay a low one-time registration fee rather than high annual fees. That said, these vehicles already come with restrictions, mainly that they are not intended for daily transportation.</p>

<p>What is changing is how tightly those rules are defined.</p>

<p>Under HF 3865, these vehicles would generally only be allowed on public roads during daylight hours on Saturdays and Sundays. Weekday driving would be prohibited unless tied to a specific event such as a parade, exhibition, or organized car activity. Night driving would also be restricted, even on weekends.&nbsp;</p>

<p>In effect, the bill moves from &ldquo;limited use&rdquo; to something closer to scheduled use.</p>

<h3>Why lawmakers say the change is needed</h3>

<p>Supporters of the bill argue that current laws are too vague. Minnesota&rsquo;s existing framework allows collector vehicles but does not clearly define what counts as acceptable use beyond general non-transportation purposes.</p>

<p>The new proposal attempts to standardize that definition. By explicitly outlining when and how these vehicles can be driven, lawmakers say they are protecting the intent of collector registration and preventing misuse by drivers trying to avoid standard registration costs. From a policy standpoint, this fits into a broader trend in which states are tightening rules on specialty vehicle classifications to ensure they are not used as loopholes.</p>

<h3>Why car owners and businesses are pushing back</h3>

<ul>
	<li>Weekday driving, including test drives after repairs, could become illegal</li>
	<li>Informal meetups and local car gatherings may no longer qualify as permitted use</li>
	<li>Restoration shops and related businesses could see reduced demand</li>
	<li>Ambiguity around what qualifies as an &ldquo;event&rdquo; could lead to inconsistent enforcement</li>
	<li>Owners may be forced to switch to standard registration to avoid restrictions</li>
</ul>

<p>Opponents argue that the bill misunderstands how car culture actually works. Classic cars are rarely used as daily drivers, but they are often driven casually throughout the week for maintenance, short trips, or community events. Limiting that flexibility risks disconnecting the law from real-world behavior.&nbsp;</p>

<h3>What this means for warranties, insurance, and ownership costs</h3>

<p>From a generalized ownership perspective, the bill could have ripple effects beyond just driving habits. Classic and collector vehicles often operate under different insurance models, with lower premiums based on limited use. If owners are forced to re-register vehicles under standard plates to maintain flexibility, that could increase insurance costs and potentially change eligibility for specialty coverage.</p>

<p>It also raises questions around <a href="https://several.com/auto-warranty" target="_blank">extended warranties and service agreements</a>. While most classic cars are not covered under traditional extended warranties, newer &ldquo;modern classics&rdquo; and limited-production vehicles sometimes are. Restricting usage patterns could influence how insurers and warranty providers assess risk, mileage, and claim eligibility.</p>

<p>If you&rsquo;re looking into eligible warranty protection, this kind of legislation is worth watching. It may signal a shift toward stricter usage-based frameworks that could eventually influence how coverage is structured.</p>

<h3>The bigger picture: Is this a one-off or a trend?</h3>

<p>Minnesota is not operating in a vacuum. Other states have explored or implemented restrictions tied to emissions, mileage limits, or usage classifications for older vehicles. <a href="https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB1392" target="_blank">California</a>, for example, has debated emissions exemptions for classic cars, while other states limit annual mileage or require secondary vehicles for daily use.</p>

<p><img alt="" loading="lazy" src="https://dwy9ix7d387oz.cloudfront.net/attachments/2026/3/ed802fa7-cea0-4e56-bdee-9f6618efbe65.jpg" /></p>

<p>What makes the Minnesota proposal stand out is how explicitly it defines when vehicles can be driven. That level of specificity is unusual and could set a precedent if adopted elsewhere.</p>

<p>There is also a broader policy tension at play. Lawmakers want to prevent abuse of discounted registration categories. At the same time, overly rigid rules risk alienating owners who are already operating within the spirit of the law.</p>

<h3>What happens next</h3>

<ol>
	<li>The bill is currently under review in Minnesota&rsquo;s legislature</li>
	<li>It must pass committee stages before reaching a full vote</li>
	<li>If approved, it would go to the governor for final sign-off</li>
	<li>Public backlash and industry pressure could influence revisions</li>
	<li>Even if it fails, similar proposals could emerge in other states</li>
</ol>

<p>The Minnesota classic car bill is less about banning vehicles outright and more about redefining how they are used. But for many owners, that distinction may not matter.</p>

<p>If passed, the law would turn classic car ownership into a far more regulated experience, limiting spontaneous use and reshaping a culture built around flexibility. For now, it remains a proposal, but it is one that could have implications well beyond a single state.</p>

<p>For more articles like this, visit our <a href="http://several.com/news/tag/automotive" target="_blank">Automotive News Page</a>!<br />
&nbsp;</p>


Minnesota Bill Could Restrict Classic Cars to Weekends

Minnesota Classic Car Bill Could Limit Weekday Driving

<h2 id="what-triggered-the-recall">What Triggered the Recall</h2>

<p>The issue stems from a faulty windshield wiper arm component that may not function as intended. Specifically, a latch retention plate may not be properly secured, which can lead to parts loosening over time. As a result, the wipers may operate inconsistently, lose synchronization, or stop working altogether. In some cases, the wiper arm could detach from the vehicle entirely.</p>

<p>This type of failure poses a direct safety concern because it affects driver visibility during rain, snow, or other conditions where clear vision is critical. Ford traced the issue back to a manufacturing defect linked to a supplier process, rather than wear and tear or driver behavior. That distinction is important because it confirms the issue originated during production.</p>

<h2 id="vehicles-included-in-the-recall">Vehicles Included in the Recall</h2>

<p>The recall affects <strong>422,613</strong> vehicles in total.</p>

<h3>Affected models</h3>

<ul>
	<li>2022&ndash;2023 Ford Super Duty trucks (F-250 to F-600)</li>
	<li>2021&ndash;2023 Ford Expedition SUVs</li>
	<li>2021&ndash;2023 Lincoln Navigator SUVs</li>
</ul>

<p>Ford estimates that only about <strong>3% of these vehicles actually have the defect</strong>, but all are being recalled as a precaution.</p>

<p>Owner notification letters are expected to be sent between April 13 and April 17, giving drivers clear instructions on what steps to take next. The company also noted that the manufacturing issue had already been corrected in late 2022, which means newer vehicles rolling off production lines are not affected by this defect.</p>

<h2 id="what-owners-should-do">What Owners Should Do</h2>

<p>Owners of affected vehicles are encouraged to check their vehicle identification number through <a href="https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls" target="_blank">NHTSA's official recall page</a> or wait for direct notification from Ford. Once notified, the next step is to schedule a visit with an authorized dealership.</p>

<p>At the dealership, technicians will inspect the windshield wiper arms and replace any defective components at no cost. The repair process is designed to address the root of the issue using updated parts that prevent the defect from recurring, giving drivers added reassurance moving forward.</p>

<p>For more industry updates, visit our <a href="https://several.com/news/tag/automotive" target="_blank">automotive news section</a>.</p>


Ford Recalls Over 422,000 Vehicles Over Wiper Failure

Ford Recalls 422K Vehicles Over Wiper Defect Risk

Meta Granted a Patent to Bring Back the Dead Through AI

Ramadan 2026 Expected to Begin Feb. 18 in the U.S.

Lunar New Year 2026: What the Year of the Fire Horse Brings

X Not Loading? Thousands Report Issues February 16, 2026

Presidents Day 2026: What’s Open & What’s Closed?

Toyota Recalls 141,000 Prius Models After Rear Door Risk

Iran War Drives Gas Prices Higher in the U.S.

Hyundai Palisade Recall After Fatal Seat Incident

Uber Adds Parking to Its App With SpotHero Acquisition

February 2026 Recall Crisis: EV Fires & Steering Failures That Could Save Your Life

New Car Prices Top $50K: Shift Toward Subscription Models

2027 Toyota Highlander Ushers in a New EV Era for the SUV Market

BMW Quietly Updates Its Iconic Logo

Estée Lauder in Talks for Puig Beauty Merger

How E.T. Turned Reese’s Pieces Into a Movie Icon

Amazon to Lay Off 16,000 Employees in Global Restructuring

Nvidia Makes History as World’s First $5 Trillion Company

Penske Media Sues Google Over AI Search Summaries

Kalshi Blocks Insider Trading in Sports & Politics Markets

Domino’s Operator Bankruptcy Points to Rising Costs

TikTok Deal Delivers $10B to Trump Administration

IBM Shares Sink as AI Disruption Hits Wall Street

Gold Hits Record $5,000 as Investors Flee Market Uncertainty

Apple Cash Raises Instant Transfer Fees: Here Are Other Options

You Can Start Filing Your Taxes on January 26 as the IRS Faces Cuts

Harvard’s PhD Cuts Signal a Growing Divide in Access to Higher Education

Artemis II & the Moments That Made the Moon Feel Human

​​The Hidden Cost of Being a Woman in 2026

Buying World Cup 2026 Tickets: Final Phase Guide

Mysterious Loud Boom Shakes Northeast Ohio: Meteor Confirmed as Cause

Daredevil: Born Again Season 2 Is the MCU’s Most Interesting Test Yet

Oscars 2026: Major Winners, Surprises & Speeches

Uber Launches Women-Only Ride Preference Nationwide

Policy Whiplash Is Breaking America’s Auto Future

WhatsApp Is Making Texting While Driving Safer for Apple Users

Amazon Is Ending Support for Older Kindles in 2026

Google Rolls Out AI Edge Eloquent, A Dictation App for iOS

AI Startup eustella Aims to Build Europe’s Answer to ChatGPT

Microsoft Copilot Sneaks Ads Into GitHub Pull Requests

The Next Battle Against AI Deepfakes May Be Built Into Chips

Meta & YouTube Found Liable in Social Media Addiction Case

Samsung Quick Share Now Works With Apple AirDrop

Best Valentine’s Day Dinner Deals for 2026

How to Make an Unsupported Kindle Usable Again

Popular Today

Latest News

Trending

In Case You Missed It