Chetu vs Nextech

Chetu, founded in 2000 and headquartered in Florida, is a U.S.-based software development company that provides custom-built electronic health record (EHR) systems. Unlike off-the-shelf platforms, Chetu’s solutions are designed to adapt to each healthcare organization’s workflows, giving providers more flexibility and control. Their EHR features include computerized provider order entry (CPOE), charge capture and coding tools, clinical decision support, customizable dashboards, laboratory information systems, e-prescribing, patient portals, telemedicine capabilities, and integration with third-party systems such as Epic and Kareo. They also emphasize compliance with HIPAA, GDPR, and ONC-ATCB standards to ensure data security and regulatory alignment. Customer feedback on Chetu’s EHR is mixed. Positive reviews highlight the company’s ability to handle complex integrations, smooth data migrations, and proactive project management. On the other hand, negative reviews point to concerns about billing transparency, contractual terms, and project delays, with some clients reporting significant costs for incomplete systems. Chetu does not publish standard pricing or plans and instead uses a custom-quote model. Costs can be high, with reports of projects reaching tens of thousands of dollars, but clients receive tailored software built specifically to their needs.

Nextech is a Tampa-based healthcare IT provider founded in 1997, delivering a cloud-based EHR and practice management platform purpose-built for specialty practices like dermatology, ophthalmology, orthopedics, plastic surgery, and med spas. Their integrated system combines clinical documentation, billing, patient engagement, and revenue cycle tools into one seamless experience, helping practices reduce operational friction and streamline workflows. Recognized as a top single-solution choice for niche specialties, they support thousands of clinicians with mobile access, drag-and-drop scheduling, and specialty-specific templates designed in collaboration with providers. What sets them apart are features like one-page ophthalmology charting, embedded TouchMD for patient engagement, and built-in analytics dashboards that give near real-time insights into performance. On the flip side, pricing details are not published, and interested practices must speak with sales to get quotes. Customer feedback cites a solid feature set and strong customization, but notes spotty support responsiveness and a learning curve for advanced users. Overall, Nextech may be a fit for practices seeking a specialty-centric, all-in-one platform, but those requiring flexible contracts or transparent pricing will want to evaluate carefully before committing.