Chetu vs InSync

Chetu, founded in 2000 and headquartered in Florida, is a U.S.-based software development company that provides custom-built electronic health record (EHR) systems. Unlike off-the-shelf platforms, Chetu’s solutions are designed to adapt to each healthcare organization’s workflows, giving providers more flexibility and control. Their EHR features include computerized provider order entry (CPOE), charge capture and coding tools, clinical decision support, customizable dashboards, laboratory information systems, e-prescribing, patient portals, telemedicine capabilities, and integration with third-party systems such as Epic and Kareo. They also emphasize compliance with HIPAA, GDPR, and ONC-ATCB standards to ensure data security and regulatory alignment. Customer feedback on Chetu’s EHR is mixed. Positive reviews highlight the company’s ability to handle complex integrations, smooth data migrations, and proactive project management. On the other hand, negative reviews point to concerns about billing transparency, contractual terms, and project delays, with some clients reporting significant costs for incomplete systems. Chetu does not publish standard pricing or plans and instead uses a custom-quote model. Costs can be high, with reports of projects reaching tens of thousands of dollars, but clients receive tailored software built specifically to their needs.

InSync EHR, founded in 2008 in Tampa, Florida, and later acquired by Qualifacts in 2021, is a cloud-based electronic health record and practice management software built for small to mid-sized behavioral health and human services providers. The platform brings together essential tools such as clinical documentation, scheduling, billing, telehealth, e-prescribing, and eMAR, offering a comprehensive solution that reduces the need for multiple systems. Its flexibility allows practices of all sizes to configure workflows, dashboards, and quick physical exam charts to fit unique needs, while integrated electronic claims submission, insurance verification, and revenue cycle management strengthen financial performance. Customer experience is mixed but leans positive. On Capterra, InSync holds a strong 4.5/5 rating, with users praising its customization, reporting capabilities, and billing process. Positive reviews highlight smooth implementation, automated billing functions, and effective patient engagement features like the robust patient portal. On the other hand, some users mention slower customer support, a steep learning curve, and system speed issues as drawbacks. When it comes to pricing, InSync does not list costs publicly. Instead, providers are encouraged to request a free demo and receive tailored quotes.