Chetu vs Epic

Chetu, founded in 2000 and headquartered in Florida, is a U.S.-based software development company that provides custom-built electronic health record (EHR) systems. Unlike off-the-shelf platforms, Chetu’s solutions are designed to adapt to each healthcare organization’s workflows, giving providers more flexibility and control. Their EHR features include computerized provider order entry (CPOE), charge capture and coding tools, clinical decision support, customizable dashboards, laboratory information systems, e-prescribing, patient portals, telemedicine capabilities, and integration with third-party systems such as Epic and Kareo. They also emphasize compliance with HIPAA, GDPR, and ONC-ATCB standards to ensure data security and regulatory alignment. Customer feedback on Chetu’s EHR is mixed. Positive reviews highlight the company’s ability to handle complex integrations, smooth data migrations, and proactive project management. On the other hand, negative reviews point to concerns about billing transparency, contractual terms, and project delays, with some clients reporting significant costs for incomplete systems. Chetu does not publish standard pricing or plans and instead uses a custom-quote model. Costs can be high, with reports of projects reaching tens of thousands of dollars, but clients receive tailored software built specifically to their needs.

Epic Systems, founded in 1979 and headquartered in Verona, Wisconsin, is one of the most widely used EHR providers in the United States, with their platform serving over 325 million patients worldwide. Their Epic EHR system is designed for diverse healthcare settings, including large hospitals, small practices, mental health facilities, and specialty clinics. Key features include specialty-specific modules for over 60 areas of medicine, role-based user interfaces, AI-powered clinical documentation, telehealth capabilities, patient engagement tools through MyChart, and strong interoperability with labs, pharmacies, and imaging centers. Epic’s pricing is not publicly listed, as costs depend on factors like organization size, chosen modules, hosting model, and training needs. Setup options include full enterprise deployment, Community Connect for smaller practices, Garden Plot for mid-sized groups, and Epic Sonnet with core features.