Cerner vs Chetu

Cerner, founded in 1979 and headquartered in Kansas City, Missouri, is one of the most established names in healthcare IT. Over the decades, they built a comprehensive suite of role-oriented solutions that serve providers, patients, employers, government agencies, and researchers. At the center of their platform is a robust electronic health record (EHR) system that connects clinical documentation, scheduling, patient portals, and education resources. They also provide advanced revenue cycle management, population health tools, and analytics powered by their Lights On Network®, which delivers real-time dashboards and benchmarking.
Beyond clinical and financial functions, Cerner has offered managed services through partnerships with AWS, SaaS products like Cerner Millennium® and Soarian®, and tiered customer support that ranges from help desk services to specialized engineering assistance. Their focus on security and compliance, backed by ISO 9001:2000 certification and an A+ Better Business Bureau accreditation, reflects a long-standing commitment to quality.

Chetu, founded in 2000 and headquartered in Florida, is a U.S.-based software development company that provides custom-built electronic health record (EHR) systems. Unlike off-the-shelf platforms, Chetu’s solutions are designed to adapt to each healthcare organization’s workflows, giving providers more flexibility and control. Their EHR features include computerized provider order entry (CPOE), charge capture and coding tools, clinical decision support, customizable dashboards, laboratory information systems, e-prescribing, patient portals, telemedicine capabilities, and integration with third-party systems such as Epic and Kareo. They also emphasize compliance with HIPAA, GDPR, and ONC-ATCB standards to ensure data security and regulatory alignment. Customer feedback on Chetu’s EHR is mixed. Positive reviews highlight the company’s ability to handle complex integrations, smooth data migrations, and proactive project management. On the other hand, negative reviews point to concerns about billing transparency, contractual terms, and project delays, with some clients reporting significant costs for incomplete systems. Chetu does not publish standard pricing or plans and instead uses a custom-quote model. Costs can be high, with reports of projects reaching tens of thousands of dollars, but clients receive tailored software built specifically to their needs.