CentralReach vs Chetu

CentralReach is a healthcare software company founded in 2012 and headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. They specialize in serving organizations that provide applied behavior analysis (ABA), autism therapy, and developmental disability services. Their platform offers a unified solution that combines clinical data collection, scheduling, billing, payroll, telehealth, and ongoing staff training, all designed to meet the complex needs of therapy-focused practices. One of their standout features is their customization capabilities, allowing users to build tailored clinical programs and data forms. They also offer CR Institute, a built-in learning management system that supports CEUs and certification prep for RBTs and BCBAs. CentralReach’s tools are built to accommodate a wide range of service settings, including in-home, school-based, and clinic care. While customer feedback is largely positive about the platform’s functionality and impact, some users report a steep learning curve and inconsistent support responsiveness. They maintain a BBB profile, have been featured on the Inc. 5000 list, and continue to grow within their niche. For organizations exploring practice management solutions in the ABA and therapy space, CentralReach presents a compelling, specialized option worth a closer look.

Chetu, founded in 2000 and headquartered in Florida, is a U.S.-based software development company that provides custom-built electronic health record (EHR) systems. Unlike off-the-shelf platforms, Chetu’s solutions are designed to adapt to each healthcare organization’s workflows, giving providers more flexibility and control. Their EHR features include computerized provider order entry (CPOE), charge capture and coding tools, clinical decision support, customizable dashboards, laboratory information systems, e-prescribing, patient portals, telemedicine capabilities, and integration with third-party systems such as Epic and Kareo. They also emphasize compliance with HIPAA, GDPR, and ONC-ATCB standards to ensure data security and regulatory alignment. Customer feedback on Chetu’s EHR is mixed. Positive reviews highlight the company’s ability to handle complex integrations, smooth data migrations, and proactive project management. On the other hand, negative reviews point to concerns about billing transparency, contractual terms, and project delays, with some clients reporting significant costs for incomplete systems. Chetu does not publish standard pricing or plans and instead uses a custom-quote model. Costs can be high, with reports of projects reaching tens of thousands of dollars, but clients receive tailored software built specifically to their needs.