InSync vs Tebra

InSync EHR, founded in 2008 in Tampa, Florida, and later acquired by Qualifacts in 2021, is a cloud-based electronic health record and practice management software built for small to mid-sized behavioral health and human services providers. The platform brings together essential tools such as clinical documentation, scheduling, billing, telehealth, e-prescribing, and eMAR, offering a comprehensive solution that reduces the need for multiple systems. Its flexibility allows practices of all sizes to configure workflows, dashboards, and quick physical exam charts to fit unique needs, while integrated electronic claims submission, insurance verification, and revenue cycle management strengthen financial performance. Customer experience is mixed but leans positive. On Capterra, InSync holds a strong 4.5/5 rating, with users praising its customization, reporting capabilities, and billing process. Positive reviews highlight smooth implementation, automated billing functions, and effective patient engagement features like the robust patient portal. On the other hand, some users mention slower customer support, a steep learning curve, and system speed issues as drawbacks. When it comes to pricing, InSync does not list costs publicly. Instead, providers are encouraged to request a free demo and receive tailored quotes.

Tebra, formed from the 2021 merger of Kareo and PatientPop, offers an all-in-one, cloud-based EHR and practice management platform tailored for independent healthcare providers. Their suite includes AI-assisted charting, telehealth, automated billing, and patient engagement tools like online scheduling and reputation management. Notable features such as “Same-as-Last-Time” (SALT) documentation and robotic process automation aim to streamline workflows and reduce administrative burdens. The platform is ONC-certified and HIPAA-compliant, emphasizing security and compliance. Tebra’s flexible pricing model, with no long-term contracts, appeals to small practices seeking scalability. However, their user reviews are mixed, with many commending their intuitive interface and efficiency, while others report challenges with customer support and occasional system downtimes. Despite some criticisms, Tebra maintains a strong presence in the market, serving over 150,000 providers and managing 190 million patient records. For independent practices aiming to modernize operations without sacrificing affordability, Tebra presents a compelling option. However, potential users should weigh their strengths against reported service inconsistencies. A thorough evaluation, including a demo and consultation, is recommended to determine their fit for specific practice needs.