Epic vs Tebra

Epic Systems, founded in 1979 and headquartered in Verona, Wisconsin, is one of the most widely used EHR providers in the United States, with their platform serving over 325 million patients worldwide. Their Epic EHR system is designed for diverse healthcare settings, including large hospitals, small practices, mental health facilities, and specialty clinics. Key features include specialty-specific modules for over 60 areas of medicine, role-based user interfaces, AI-powered clinical documentation, telehealth capabilities, patient engagement tools through MyChart, and strong interoperability with labs, pharmacies, and imaging centers. Epic’s pricing is not publicly listed, as costs depend on factors like organization size, chosen modules, hosting model, and training needs. Setup options include full enterprise deployment, Community Connect for smaller practices, Garden Plot for mid-sized groups, and Epic Sonnet with core features.

Tebra, formed from the 2021 merger of Kareo and PatientPop, offers an all-in-one, cloud-based EHR and practice management platform tailored for independent healthcare providers. Their suite includes AI-assisted charting, telehealth, automated billing, and patient engagement tools like online scheduling and reputation management. Notable features such as “Same-as-Last-Time” (SALT) documentation and robotic process automation aim to streamline workflows and reduce administrative burdens. The platform is ONC-certified and HIPAA-compliant, emphasizing security and compliance. Tebra’s flexible pricing model, with no long-term contracts, appeals to small practices seeking scalability. However, their user reviews are mixed, with many commending their intuitive interface and efficiency, while others report challenges with customer support and occasional system downtimes. Despite some criticisms, Tebra maintains a strong presence in the market, serving over 150,000 providers and managing 190 million patient records. For independent practices aiming to modernize operations without sacrificing affordability, Tebra presents a compelling option. However, potential users should weigh their strengths against reported service inconsistencies. A thorough evaluation, including a demo and consultation, is recommended to determine their fit for specific practice needs.