Azalea Health vs Chetu

Azalea Health was founded in 2008 in Valdosta, Georgia, and is now headquartered in Atlanta. They provide cloud-based healthcare IT solutions tailored to small practices, rural health clinics, and critical access hospitals. Their platform combines electronic health records, practice management software, revenue cycle management, analytics, and telehealth services into one system designed to simplify operations and improve patient care. Core features include a single patient record that unifies clinical and billing information, a patient portal for engagement, customizable templates, real-time updates, integrated billing workflows, and built-in telehealth sessions. Customer experience with Azalea Health is mixed but leans positive overall. Users often praise the system’s ease of use, responsive customer support, and quick onboarding, with some users reporting full training completed in under a week. At the same time, negative reviews mention long-term contracts, additional fees for features, and occasional performance slowdowns. Azalea does not publish standard pricing; instead, they offer a quote-based model. While some practices found them initially affordable, others reported rising costs due to add-ons and package changes. 

Chetu, founded in 2000 and headquartered in Florida, is a U.S.-based software development company that provides custom-built electronic health record (EHR) systems. Unlike off-the-shelf platforms, Chetu’s solutions are designed to adapt to each healthcare organization’s workflows, giving providers more flexibility and control. Their EHR features include computerized provider order entry (CPOE), charge capture and coding tools, clinical decision support, customizable dashboards, laboratory information systems, e-prescribing, patient portals, telemedicine capabilities, and integration with third-party systems such as Epic and Kareo. They also emphasize compliance with HIPAA, GDPR, and ONC-ATCB standards to ensure data security and regulatory alignment. Customer feedback on Chetu’s EHR is mixed. Positive reviews highlight the company’s ability to handle complex integrations, smooth data migrations, and proactive project management. On the other hand, negative reviews point to concerns about billing transparency, contractual terms, and project delays, with some clients reporting significant costs for incomplete systems. Chetu does not publish standard pricing or plans and instead uses a custom-quote model. Costs can be high, with reports of projects reaching tens of thousands of dollars, but clients receive tailored software built specifically to their needs.