OVPN vs VIP72

Founded in 2014 and based in Sweden, OVPN is a privacy-focused VPN provider known for its strict no-logs policy and diskless servers, ensuring no user data is stored. Their court-tested privacy stance has reinforced their reputation as a secure choice for users seeking anonymity. They utilize AES-256-GCM encryption, WireGuard protocol, and multihop connections for enhanced security, along with split tunneling, port forwarding, and a kill switch for better control over online privacy. OVPN supports BBC iPlayer, Amazon Prime Video, and HBO Max, making them a decent option for streaming, though their limited server network, primarily in North America and Europe, may impact global access and speed. They offer monthly, annual, and three-year plans, all backed by a 10-day money-back guarantee. While OVPN is a strong choice for privacy-focused users, their small server network and limited simultaneous connections may not suit everyone.

VIP72 VPN was a privacy-focused service provider founded in 2006 and headquartered in the United States. Offering a combination of VPN, proxy, and SOCKS proxy services, they catered to users looking for strong anonymity, geo-restriction bypassing, and secure browsing. Their network included VPN servers in 13+ countries and a massive SOCKS proxy infrastructure spanning 182 countries, allowing users to mask their IPs and access restricted content. VIP72 utilized 256-bit encryption with OpenVPN protocols, ensuring secure connections for activities such as P2P file sharing and accessing streaming platforms like Netflix, BBC iPlayer, and Amazon Prime. They also supported residential IPs and HTTP header modifications, which set them apart in the proxy market. However, concerns over slow speeds, outdated infrastructure, and a lack of customer support led to mixed feedback from users. Additionally, allegations of involvement in the Bunitu Trojan botnet raised security concerns, further impacting their credibility. Despite operating for over 15 years, VIP72 shut down in 2021, leaving many users without notice. While their extensive proxy network and privacy tools made them a unique player in the VPN industry, their abrupt disappearance and questionable security practices make them a controversial provider worth deeper investigation.