OurTime vs Zoosk

OurTime, founded in 2011, is a dedicated senior dating platform now headquartered in Dallas under the Match Group umbrella. It serves men and women aged 50 and up with an array of easy-to-use features – from detailed search filters and daily match suggestions to fun “swipe” style games – all crafted for a generation less familiar with dating apps. With over 8 million monthly visits, OurTime boasts one of the largest senior user bases, primarily across the US, Canada, and the UK, ensuring a broad pool of potential matches. The site emphasizes safety and comfort: profiles are moderated, there’s an option to verify photos for authenticity, and unique tools like incognito browsing and private calling help users maintain privacy. In terms of reputation, OurTime is frequently listed among the top senior dating sites, and customer feedback is varied – many appreciate the intuitive interface and like-minded community, though some report encounters with scammers or wish more features were free. Pricing is mid-range with significant discounts on longer plans (around $12.99/month on an annual plan). The service offers good value, especially given extras like local member events and accessible customer support (including phone assistance). Overall, OurTime delivers a specialized dating experience focused on bringing companionship, love, and new adventures to the over-50 crowd, making online dating feasible and enjoyable for seniors stepping into an exciting new chapter.

Since its launch in 2007, Zoosk has carved a niche in online dating with its Behavioral Matchmaking™ system—an algorithm that learns from user interactions to refine matches over time. With 40+ million members across 80+ countries, it offers a blend of swipe-style discovery (Carousel) and advanced filters, appealing to both casual daters and those seeking serious connections. Standout features like Zoosk Live (free livestreaming) and robust photo verification tools enhance engagement and safety. However, Zoosk’s freemium model draws criticism. Free users face restrictive messaging limits, while premium features, like seeing who liked you, often require additional Zoosk Coins, creating a layered paywall. User reviews highlight inconsistent match quality, technical glitches (especially on Android), and frustrations with auto-renewing subscriptions. While its global reach and adaptive tech are strengths, Zoosk struggles with transparency and competes with sleeker rivals like Bumble or Hinge. For daters willing to invest in a subscription, Zoosk’s data-driven approach can yield results, but it’s best suited for urban users or those open to international matches. Read our full review to see if its perks outweigh the pitfalls.