OysterVPN vs VIP72
Press [Add to Compare] to Edit, Add or Remove Vendors
- Reliable for streaming and torrenting
- Strong security and privacy
- Easy-to-use apps across devices
- Privacy-friendly jurisdiction
- Supports P2P file sharing
- Bypasses geo-restrictions
- Limited global coverage
- No independent privacy audit
- Lacks advanced features
- Inconsistent speeds on select servers
- Support quality varies
- No free trial
- No mobile support
- Slow speeds and performance issues
- No customer support options
- Security concerns and alleged involvement in malware distribution
- No refunds or free trial
Founded in 2022 and headquartered in the British Virgin Islands, OysterVPN is a relatively new entrant in the cybersecurity space, but one that’s already gaining traction for its commitment to performance, transparency, and ease of use. Their VPN service includes features like WireGuard support, strong ChaCha20-Poly1305 encryption, a strict no-logs policy, and compatibility with all major operating systems. Users can enjoy unlimited bandwidth, fast server connections, and dedicated apps for Windows, macOS, Android, and iOS. OysterVPN also provides split tunneling, multi-hop capabilities, and DNS leak protection, making it a compelling option for both privacy-focused users and everyday streamers. While independent customer reviews are still limited, early adopters have praised its interface and reliability. With a growing network and modern encryption standards, OysterVPN positions itself as a capable and privacy-first VPN solution worth exploring.
VIP72 VPN was a privacy-focused service provider founded in 2006 and headquartered in the United States. Offering a combination of VPN, proxy, and SOCKS proxy services, they catered to users looking for strong anonymity, geo-restriction bypassing, and secure browsing. Their network included VPN servers in 13+ countries and a massive SOCKS proxy infrastructure spanning 182 countries, allowing users to mask their IPs and access restricted content. VIP72 utilized 256-bit encryption with OpenVPN protocols, ensuring secure connections for activities such as P2P file sharing and accessing streaming platforms like Netflix, BBC iPlayer, and Amazon Prime. They also supported residential IPs and HTTP header modifications, which set them apart in the proxy market. However, concerns over slow speeds, outdated infrastructure, and a lack of customer support led to mixed feedback from users. Additionally, allegations of involvement in the Bunitu Trojan botnet raised security concerns, further impacting their credibility. Despite operating for over 15 years, VIP72 shut down in 2021, leaving many users without notice. While their extensive proxy network and privacy tools made them a unique player in the VPN industry, their abrupt disappearance and questionable security practices make them a controversial provider worth deeper investigation.
- Price : Starting at $5.99 per month
- Free Trial : Unavailable
- Global Coverage : 30+
- Customer Experience : Good
- Number of Servers : 400+
- Price : Starting at $9 per week, $25 per month, or $265 per year
- Free Trial : Unavailable
- Global Coverage : Servers in 13+ countries, SOCKS proxy in 182 countries
- Customer Experience : Poor
- Number of Servers : Approx. 13 VPN server locations, 2,500 SOCKS proxy servers
- Exceptional value for money
- 24/7 customer support
- Multi-device use and broad compatibility
- Strong anonymity features
- Large proxy network
- Allows Torrenting
- Antivirus / Antimalware
- Free Version
- Integrated SSOs
- Mobile App
- Onion Over VPN Support—Undisclosed
- OpenVPN Support
- Password Manager
- Propriety Protocol
- Streaming Support—Undisclosed
- WireGuard Support
- Allows Torrenting
- Antivirus / Antimalware
- Free Version
- Integrated SSOs—Undisclosed
- Mobile App
- Onion Over VPN Support—Undisclosed
- OpenVPN Support
- Password Manager
- Propriety Protocol
- Streaming Support
- WireGuard Support
- 256-bit AES Encryption
- Dedicated IP Servers—Undisclosed
- Kill-Switch
- RAM-Only Servers
- Split Tunneling
- Two-Factor Authentication
- Warrant Canary
- Zero-Logging-Policy
- 256-bit AES Encryption
- Dedicated IP Servers
- Kill-Switch—Undisclosed
- RAM-Only Servers
- Split Tunneling
- Two-Factor Authentication—Undisclosed
- Warrant Canary—Undisclosed
- Zero-Logging-Policy
- Actionable Password Strength Report
- Biometric Logins (Face ID, Touch ID)
- Dark Web Scanning
- Located Outside of the 5/9/14 Eyes Alliance
- Mobile App PIN Unlock—Undisclosed
- Obfuscated Servers—Undisclosed
- Secure Password Sharing
- Actionable Password Strength Report
- Biometric Logins (Face ID, Touch ID)
- Dark Web Scanning
- Located Outside of the 5/9/14 Eyes Alliance
- Mobile App PIN Unlock—Undisclosed
- Obfuscated Servers—Undisclosed
- Secure Password Sharing
- Android
- Browser Plugins
- ChromeOS
- Fire OS
- iOS
- Linux
- macOS
- Routers
- Streaming Devices
- Windows
- Android
- Browser Plugins—Undisclosed
- ChromeOS—Undisclosed
- Fire OS—Undisclosed
- iOS
- Linux
- macOS
- Routers
- Streaming Devices
- Windows
- FAQs
- Help Guides
- Live Chat
- Phone
- Social Media
- Ticket—Undisclosed
- FAQs
- Help Guides
- Live Chat
- Phone
- Social Media
- Ticket