BullGuard VPN vs SpeedVPN

BullGuard VPN was a privacy-focused virtual private network service developed by BullGuard, a cybersecurity company founded in 2002 and headquartered in the United Kingdom. Known for their strong encryption, no-logs policy, and ease of use, the VPN aimed to provide secure, unrestricted internet access for users worldwide. With around 2,000 servers in 16 countries, they offered geo-restriction bypassing, automatic Wi-Fi protection, and a built-in kill switch, ensuring user data remained safe. Despite their user-friendly design and strong security features, BullGuard VPN had limitations, including a smaller server network, lack of split tunneling, and no support for routers or smart TVs. User feedback was generally positive, with praise for their consistent connection speeds and simple setup, though some users noted the absence of advanced features compared to larger VPN providers. Following NortonLifeLock’s acquisition of BullGuard, the VPN service was discontinued in July 2022, with users directed to Norton’s cybersecurity solutions. While BullGuard VPN is no longer available, their privacy-first approach and commitment to security left a mark in the VPN industry. Read on for a detailed breakdown of their past features, performance, and how they compared to competitors.

SpeedVPN is a free VPN application developed by GoSpeed Software, designed primarily for mobile devices. Founded in 2020 and headquartered in an undisclosed location, SpeedVPN aims to provide users with a simple and accessible way to enhance their online privacy and bypass geo-restrictions. The app features a one-click functionality that automatically selects the best server based on user location, making them user-friendly for those seeking quick access to VPN services. Despite their ease of use, SpeedVPN has received mixed feedback from users. While they offer unlimited free time and premium bandwidth, sessions are limited to 240 minutes, leading to frequent disconnections and inconsistent connection speeds. Critics have pointed out the limited server options, which include only a handful of countries such as the USA, Canada, and Germany, potentially restricting users' choices. Furthermore, concerns have been raised regarding the app's data privacy practices, as there is a lack of transparency about how user data is managed, especially compared to more established competitors like ExpressVPN and NordVPN1.