Content
Recent Posts
Tesla Cybertruck Doors Under Fire After Fatal Crashes

Tesla faces intensified scrutiny following fatal crash lawsuits alleging its Cybertruck door design trapped victims inside a burning vehicle, with survivors and witnesses describing harrowing escape struggles. Beyond legal implications, this tragedy exposes critical challenges tied to human factors in emergencies and raises questions about how the electric vehicle industry handles door safety.
Content
Panic, Smoke, & Darkness: Real-World Barriers to Escape
In the chaos of high-impact crashes, especially with fire or smoke, panic overwhelms occupants. Complex or unfamiliar door mechanisms become deadly obstacles. The Cybertruck’s electronic door handles, reliant on battery power, combined with manual release levers that are difficult to locate, only magnify these risks.
Children, injured passengers, or disoriented occupants struggle to operate intricate door systems. Safety experts emphasize that emergency egress design must prioritize intuitive, fail-safe manual options alongside electronic convenience. The recent lawsuit from 19-year-old Krysta Tsukahara’s family—who perished in a November 2024 crash where victims were trapped—highlights tragic results when these principles aren’t fully met.
How Tesla Compares: An Industry-Wide Challenge
Tesla is not alone in balancing innovation with safety in door design. Many EV makers use electronic or flush-mounted handles to enhance aerodynamics and aesthetics, but emergency usability varies:
- Ford’s electric Mustang Mach-E uses traditional mechanical handles with electronic locking for manual override
- Rivian places visible, accessible manual releases clearly marked for emergencies
- Lucid Motors offers touch-sensitive handles coupled with battery-independent manual releases for quick access
Tesla’s Cybertruck door system faces criticism for its complexity and reliance on electronic power, which may fail post-crash. Experts view this as an industry-wide growing pain where innovation must still guarantee life-saving function when power is lost or the environment is chaotic.
Legal Fallout & Future Implications
Lawsuits allege Tesla’s door designs show “conscious disregard” for consumer safety despite prior complaints and recalls. Federal investigations into door handle failures compound scrutiny. This case may reshape regulatory standards across EVs, pushing stricter mandates on manual emergency exits and clearer design for crises.
For consumers, these issues spotlight key safety trade-offs in the rush to electrification and sleek design. For automakers, the ongoing challenge is to combine technology with a reliable emergency function that saves lives when it matters most.
To find more news and trends from the automotive industry, check out our automotive news page.