trusted formSnapchat Memories Are No Longer Free? What Users Should Know | Several.com
Although we earn commissions from partners, we ensure unbiased evaluations. More on our 'How We Work' page
Snapchat To Charge For Old Memories Storage

Snapchat to Charge for Old Memories Storage, Causing Upset

Snapchat to Charge for Old Memories Storage, Causing UpsetSnapchat to Charge for Old Memories Storage, Causing Upset
Snapchat memories are no longer free? Here’s what users should know
Updated On: October 2, 2025

Snapchat is making a major shift in how it handles stored content in its Memories feature, and the implications are already sparking debate. For years, users could save old photos and videos indefinitely in their Memories without worrying about storage limits. That’s about to change. In a move announced recently, Snapchat will begin charging users whose saved content exceeds a 5 GB free threshold.

Under the new structure, users who stay under 5 GB won’t see any changes. Beyond that, Snapchat is introducing tiered paid plans. The basic paid tier offers 100 GB of storage for $1.99 per month in the U.S. A higher tier is bundled into the $3.99 Snapchat+ subscription with 250 GB of space. There’s also a more premium option called Snapchat Platinum that increases the cap to 5 TB.

Snap says that it will provide affected users with a grace period: those who exceed the 5 GB limit will retain access to their content for 12 months while they decide whether to upgrade or download their Memories locally. The company frames the move as necessary to maintain and improve the Memories feature itself, especially given how storage demands have grown over time.

This step is part of a broader trend in social media monetization. Free storage is no longer as sustainable as it used to be. Snapchat claims that since the Memories feature launched in 2016, users have saved more than one trillion snaps and videos. That astronomical volume of data means real costs for servers, bandwidth, and maintenance. As Snapchat expands its paid offerings, it seems to be leaning more heavily into subscription-based revenue.

Not everyone is thrilled. Many longtime users are upset that something once free is now going behind a paywall. Users who’ve accumulated thousands of photos and memories over the years feel blindsided by the change. Some critics on social media have accused Snapchat of being greedy or unfair, especially toward those with large archives. Others point out that Snapchat competes with other platforms that have larger user bases; users might simply shift away if they see Snapchat as less generous or more costly.

From Snapchat’s perspective, however, it says most users will remain unaffected because many already keep less than 5 GB in their Memories. For those users, the experience is meant to stay unchanged. But for high-volume users, it could become a recurring expense or a tough decision about which memories to keep.

Another point worth noting is that Snapchat gives users the option to download their content if they decide not to pay. In other words, nothing is forcibly deleted immediately; there’s a period to act. That said, the pressure is clear: either pay or move off the platform with your memories in hand.

There are regional and pricing uncertainties, too. Snapchat hasn’t fully disclosed pricing in all markets. For example, the company has not yet announced how much each tier will cost in the U.K. and elsewhere. Different markets may see different tiers and limits or localized price adjustments.

This shift has broader implications. It signals that storage, once treated as a backend utility, is now viewed as a monetizable feature for social platforms. Companies may feel compelled to recover costs as content expectations shift and users accumulate more media. Experts believe other platforms like Instagram could follow suit. The move also highlights users' tension: how much are we willing to pay to preserve digital history?

For more articles like this, visit our tech news page!

Related Topics

Recent Posts